Side N
Inkling: Thinking Machines' Open Model, and the Rival It Learned From
Which sources back which section of this article, and what its evidence base looks like.
Which sources back which section
| Section | Sources behind it |
|---|---|
| What Happened | Thinking Machines' own release posts for Inkling and Inkling-Small, its product page, and both models' Hugging Face repositories; China's Open-Weight Takeover (Data Gravity); Artificial Analysis's launch-day article; Cognition's own methodology post, read to check for an Inkling-specific score. |
| Timeline | Thinking Machines' own release posts and both models' Hugging Face repositories; the Bridgewater/Thinking Machines Tinker case study; China's Open-Weight Takeover (Data Gravity); both of Artificial Analysis's articles; Thinking Machines' manifesto and its safety-process post. |
| The Argument | Thinking Machines' own release post and Inkling's Hugging Face repository; the Bridgewater/Thinking Machines Tinker case study; China's Open-Weight Takeover (Data Gravity); Artificial Analysis's launch-day article; Thinking Machines' manifesto. |
| What Others Add | Artificial Analysis's Inkling-Small article; Thinking Machines' own safety-process post. |
| Conclusion | Thinking Machines' own release post and Inkling's Hugging Face repository; the Bridgewater/Thinking Machines Tinker case study; China's Open-Weight Takeover (Data Gravity); Artificial Analysis's launch-day article; Cognition's own methodology post; Thinking Machines' manifesto and its safety-process post. |
What the evidence base looks like
- 12Sources behind this article
- 5Sections, every one of them sourced
- 12Read in full, directly at the source
| What the source is | How many | How they were read |
|---|---|---|
| Thinking Machines' own material — its model cards, release posts and product page for Inkling and Inkling-Small | 7 | All read in full, directly at Thinking Machines' own site and model repositories |
| A platform customer's case study and a rival lab's own methodology post | 2 | Both read in full |
| Independent market and benchmark analysis, with no stake in either lab | 3 | All read in full |
Reliable
Reliable, but with an interestWorth believing and reliableWeak on both, and used with careHonest, but thin
Worth believing