Tratopedia
Side N繁中
Settings

Text size

Language

Theme

High contrast

Version

v1.177.0

The release this page was built from. It is what the service worker caches under.

Side N

The Spark That Starts a Fire — Anonymous Tip-Offs and Singapore's CPIB

Which sources back which section of this article, and what its evidence base looks like.

Which sources back which section

SectionSources behind it
What HappenedCPIB, 2025 annual corruption statistics; CPIB, “Management Of Corruption Complaints”; CPIB, “Reporting Of Corruption Complaints”
TimelineCPIB, 2025 annual corruption statistics; CPIB, “Management Of Corruption Complaints”; CPIB, “Our Heritage”; Prevention of Corruption Act 1960; Transparency International, Corruption Perceptions Index 2025; Malay Mail, 18 Jan and 25 Sep 2024; Wikipedia, “Prosecution of S. Iswaran”; Free Malaysia Today, 6 Jun 2025
The ArgumentCPIB, 2025 annual corruption statistics; CPIB, “Management Of Corruption Complaints”; CPIB, “Our Heritage”; Constitution of the Republic of Singapore, Art. 22G; Prevention of Corruption Act 1960; Malay Mail, 25 Sep 2024
What Others AddCPIB annual corruption statistics, 2022–2025; CPIB, “Management Of Corruption Complaints”; CPIB, “Our Heritage”; Transparency International, Corruption Perceptions Index 2025
ConclusionCPIB annual corruption statistics, 2022 and 2025; CPIB, “Management Of Corruption Complaints”; Transparency International, Corruption Perceptions Index 2025

What the evidence base looks like

  • 14Sources behind this article
  • 5Sections, every one of them sourced
  • 14Read in full
  • 7Published by CPIB itself
What the source isHow manyHow they were read
The institution the article is about7All read in full; the 2025 release’s charts read directly as images
Statute law2Both read in full, in the official consolidated text
The publisher of the index1Read in full
News reporting3All read in full; one relays the prison service through two other outlets
Encyclopaedia1Read in full; used only to corroborate

Reliable

Reliable, but with an interestWorth believing and reliableWeak on both, and used with careHonest, but thin

Worth believing

Each point is one source used, placed by two judgements on a six-step scale. Points carry no names: the chart shows the shape of the evidence, not a verdict on any publisher.