Tratopedia
Side N繁中
Settings

Text size

Language

Theme

High contrast

Version

v1.177.0

The release this page was built from. It is what the service worker caches under.

Side N

The Harness Ships, the Governance Doesn’t

Which sources back which section of this article, and what its evidence base looks like.

Which sources back which section

SectionSources behind it
What HappenedSalapa’s paper (arXiv:2608.20622); the arXiv API’s own bibliographic record; the PyPI JSON record for micro-cc; the micro-cc source distribution (version 0.2.72); Dhage, on deterministic execution constraints
TimelineAnthropic’s harness-design post; Bechard, Marquez Ayala, Chen, Skelton, Davasam, Sunkara, Yadav & Rajeswar; the PyPI JSON record for micro-cc; Ivanov, Rana & Prabhakaran; Liu, Zhao, Shang & Shen; Zhang, Wang, Ge, Xu, Hamm & Reddy; Pan & Hou; Ishibashi, Yano & Oyamada; Ning et al. (42 authors); Chen et al. (HarnessX); Gore (SHarD); Salapa’s paper; Dhage
The ArgumentSalapa’s paper, quoted directly; Bechard, Marquez Ayala, Chen, Skelton, Davasam, Sunkara, Yadav & Rajeswar; Ivanov, Rana & Prabhakaran; Pan & Hou; Ning et al. (42 authors); Zhang, Wang, Ge, Xu, Hamm & Reddy; the PyPI JSON record for micro-cc; the micro-cc source distribution, including its LICENSE file and claude_loop_.py
What Others AddGore (SHarD); Dhage; Chen et al. (HarnessX); Anthropic, How we built our multi-agent research system; Anthropic, Harness design for long-running application development
ConclusionSalapa’s paper; the arXiv API’s own bibliographic record; the PyPI JSON record for micro-cc; the micro-cc source distribution

What the evidence base looks like

  • 16Sources behind this article
  • 5Sections, every one of them sourced
  • 6Read in full
  • 1Approached and set aside, cited nowhere
What the source isHow manyHow they were read
The paper under review1Read in full, as the supplied 21-page PDF, and checked against the arXiv API’s own record
Bibliographic and package registries2Both read in full via their own JSON APIs — arXiv’s for the citation check, PyPI’s for the release history
The reference implementation’s own source code1Downloaded and searched in full: 231 files, with the licence and the approval-gate code quoted directly
The vendor whose primitives the paper applies2Both of Anthropic’s engineering posts read in full, fetched via curl
Comparison literature in the same field10Abstract read via the arXiv API; full text not read for any of them

Reliable

Reliable, but with an interestWorth believing and reliableWeak on both, and used with careHonest, but thin

Worth believing

Each point is one source used, placed by two judgements on a six-step scale. Points carry no names: the chart shows the shape of the evidence, not a verdict on any publisher.