Tratopedia
Side N繁中
Settings

Text size

Language

Theme

High contrast

Version

v1.177.0

The release this page was built from. It is what the service worker caches under.

Side N

One Brake, Three Different Levers

Which sources back which section of this article, and what its evidence base looks like.

Which sources back which section

SectionSources behind it
What HappenedBBC Future, Quaglia (2026); Sontag, Hoffmann, Rogers & Yates, Advanced Science (2026); Buhl and others, Science (2006); Planas-Sitjà and others, PLoS ONE (2018); Planas-Sitjà and others, Proc. R. Soc. B (2015); Planas-Sitjà, Behavioural Processes (2020)
TimelineBBC Future, Quaglia (2026); Sontag, Hoffmann, Rogers & Yates, Advanced Science (2026); University of Bath press release (2026); University of Bath Research Data Archive (2026); Buhl and others, Science (2006); Di Caro & Dorigo, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (1998); Marco Dorigo’s own CV page; Planas-Sitjà and others, PLoS ONE (2018); Planas-Sitjà and others, Proc. R. Soc. B (2015); Seeley and others, Science (2012); Seeley, Honeybee Democracy, Princeton University Press (2010); DasGupta, Ferreira & Miesenböck, Science (2014); Burke & Waddell, Current Biology (2011)
The ArgumentSontag, Hoffmann, Rogers & Yates, Advanced Science (2026); Di Caro & Dorigo, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (1998); Seeley and others, Science (2012); Seeley, Honeybee Democracy, Princeton University Press (2010)
What Others AddBBC Future, Quaglia (2026); Di Caro & Dorigo, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (1998); Marco Dorigo’s own CV page; Planas-Sitjà and others, PLoS ONE (2018); Planas-Sitjà and others, Proc. R. Soc. B (2015); Seeley and others, Science (2012); Seeley, Honeybee Democracy, Princeton University Press (2010); DasGupta, Ferreira & Miesenböck, Science (2014)
ConclusionBBC Future, Quaglia (2026); Sontag, Hoffmann, Rogers & Yates, Advanced Science (2026); University of Bath press release (2026); Seeley and others, Science (2012)

What the evidence base looks like

  • 14Sources behind this article
  • 5Sections, every one of them sourced
  • 5Read in full
  • 9Read at the abstract only
What the source isHow manyHow they were read
Primary research papers, and the data record behind one of them10Two read in full — the 2026 paper and its data record; eight at the abstract
The press feature the article reviews1Read in full, at the publisher’s own page
Accounts by an interested party: a university on its own research, a researcher on himself2Both read in full
A publisher’s page for a book1The publisher’s description and bibliographic details; the book itself was not read

Reliable

Reliable, but with an interestWorth believing and reliableWeak on both, and used with careHonest, but thin

Worth believing

Each point is one source used, placed by two judgements on a six-step scale. Points carry no names: the chart shows the shape of the evidence, not a verdict on any publisher.