Tratopedia
Side N繁中
Settings

Text size

Language

Theme

High contrast

Version

v1.177.0

The release this page was built from. It is what the service worker caches under.

Side N

The Front Stopped Moving. The War Did Not.

Which sources back which section of this article, and what its evidence base looks like.

Which sources back which section

SectionSources behind itCount
What happenedThe ISW assessment of 20 September; the UN mission’s August civilian-casualty report; the IAEA Director General’s Update 366; the EIA fuel series; the ACLED Conflict Index.5 sources
TimelineThe same five, dated from each publisher’s own record, with no additional source introduced.5 sources
The argumentThe ISW assessment of 20 September alone. The section’s whole claim is a pairing within one document, and it deliberately draws on nothing else.1 source
What others addThe UN mission’s report and publications index; the IAEA update; the EIA series; ACLED; SIPRI; the European Commission’s assistance page; NATO’s Ukraine page; the ICRC’s Ukraine page.8 sources
ConclusionThe ISW assessment, the UN report, the EIA series and ACLED. It introduces no source the sections above have not already used.4 sources

What the evidence base looks like

  • 11Sources used on the page
  • 10Read in full at their own address; one at a mirror because its publisher refused
  • 7Institutions that count and publish a figure as a matter of routine
  • 7Pages approached that refused an unattended request, none of them cited
FunctionHow manyHow they were read
Reference6Full text — bodies that compile and publish a series: the UN mission, the EIA, ACLED, SIPRI and the assessment index
Origin3Full text — institutions writing about their own work: NATO, the European Commission and the ICRC
Reporting1Full text — the daily campaign assessment, which both reports and adjudicates competing claims
Reference, at a mirror1Full text of the agency’s statement, read where it is reproduced because the agency’s own site refused

Reliable

Reliable, but with an interestWorth believing and reliableWeak on both, and used with careHonest, but thin

Worth believing

Each point is one source used, placed by two judgements on a six-step scale. Points carry no names: the chart shows the shape of the evidence, not a verdict on any publisher.