Tratopedia
Side N繁中
Settings

Text size

Language

Theme

High contrast

Version

v1.177.0

The release this page was built from. It is what the service worker caches under.

Side N

Nobody Can Tell You the Odds

Which sources back which section of this article, and what its evidence base looks like.

Which sources back which section

SectionSources behind itCount
What happenedThe 2026 Doomsday Clock statement and the Clock timeline; the Manifold API search; the geopolitical risk index page and its data export; the ACLED Conflict Index; the UN mission’s August report; the 80,000 Hours profile.7 sources
TimelineThe Clock timeline and the 2026 statement for the settings; ACLED for its publication date; the risk index page for its update cadence; the UN report for its date.5 sources
The argumentThe Manifold search, the ACLED index and the UN report — the three readable instruments whose disagreement the section turns on.3 sources
What others addAll nine: the three Bulletin pages, the Manifold search, the risk index page and its export, ACLED, the UN report and the 80,000 Hours profile.9 sources
ConclusionThe 2026 Clock statement, the Manifold search, ACLED and the UN report. It introduces no source the sections above have not already used.4 sources

What the evidence base looks like

  • 9Sources used on the page
  • 8Read in full; the ninth downloaded but would not open, and no value from it is used
  • 6Requests that were refused, five of them for the instruments a reader is most often pointed at
  • 0Figures taken from a secondary summary in place of a source that could not be read
FunctionHow manyHow they were read
Origin4Full text — instruments publishing themselves: the Bulletin’s three pages and the risk index’s own page
Reference2Full text — two bodies publishing a counted series with its window stated: ACLED and the UN mission
Vendor record1Full text, via a public API — live market prices with their participant counts
Community1Full text — a research organisation’s published problem profile
Retrieved, not parsed1Downloaded in full and unreadable with the tooling available; no value from it appears on the page

Reliable

Reliable, but with an interestWorth believing and reliableWeak on both, and used with careHonest, but thin

Worth believing

Each point is one source used, placed by two judgements on a six-step scale. Points carry no names: the chart shows the shape of the evidence, not a verdict on any publisher.